- The Method
- Who we help
- How we work
- Results
- Insights
- About
- Assessment See the Method
This company provides automated health survey platforms to hospital systems across the country. The platform is the product, and it had become unstable, difficult to scale, and exposed on security and compliance.
One hundred and thirty-five recurring operational issues were in play. The reasonable first assumption was that this was an engineering problem requiring engineering fixes.
Looking at it more closely, the pattern was different. Workflows were inconsistent between teams. There was no clear process for how an issue got identified, who owned it, and when it got reviewed. Problems were found late, which meant they were found expensively.
We worked on how IT work was managed rather than only on the defects themselves.
As stability improved, the same structure was pointed at compliance and scalability, which had been impossible to address while the team was absorbed in firefighting.
Recurring issues went from one hundred and thirty-five to sustained periods with zero new issues.
The platform became materially more stable, more secure, and able to scale with the hospital systems relying on it. Compliance performance strengthened and regulatory exposure came down.
Because more than forty leaders were trained rather than a handful, the improvement held. Roles were clearer and accountability sat with the people closest to the work.
Technical instability is usually a symptom. When there is no shared way to surface and own problems, defects accumulate faster than any team can fix them, regardless of how good the engineers are.